|
Brian A. Kilgore Communications Consulting
Communications - Based Management Counsel
Our principal business is providing
public relations and corporate communications services
Learn about our public relations & corporate communications
firm, at Who we are, how we think, and
what we do or click here for a
list of what we do.
E-mail to BrianKilgore@BrianKilgore.com
Phone 416 - 879 - 5771
Hello IABC Cafe Readers.
Warren sent you
to the wrong page.
Click here, and you'll be up to date.
But you're welcome to
read this page, too.
Dangers of caching. Here's why
you are here. Warren did a Google search to get the link to post
inside the IABC Cafe, and Google has a cached version of this page
up near the top of its listings for me. So Warren used this as the
link. WWW.BrianKilgore.com
gets you to my current web opening page.
New
July 2004 BAK's Report is here.
Portraits
from the Sears Cosmetics Gala May 1
Portrait photos taken at
the Sears Cosmetics Gala are here
right now Take a look!
|
|

LANCOME PORTRAITS AT
SEARS
The photographs are wonderful. Here's one
below I really like. PORTRAITS
TAKEN AT LANCOME / SEARS START HERE
and continue on several web pages. Page
two is here.
Page three is here. Page
four is here. Page
five is here. And
page six is here.

|
PERSONAL
PORTRAITS
I'm delighted with the number of requests I am receiving,
asking me to
shoot portraits of individuals. It's long been a serious
part of my business, but until recently most of the shooting
has been on behalf of corporations or government
departments. A great many portraits were of authors, used
for book covers and publicity. But now the requests are
coming for photographs for mantels and frames in homes, and
for desks at the office to remind hard workers of their
loved ones. The new web site will have a special personal
portrait section, but there's
information here, now. |
JUMP
TO NEWS & COMMENT
JUMP
TO PHOTOGRAPHY SECTIONS
There's a
street circus -- free -- in Toronto next weekend.
Out for a walk tonight, I met Duke Dreamer, one of the
performers, and he gave me these posters. The Distillery
District is well worth a visit, and kids and grownups alike
love the circus. It turns out that Duke knows one of the
performers my son really likes. Small world. Go to the
circus if you are in Toronto. |
 |
|
For David and Chrissy and
others. Two jumps to
employee opinion info are here and are here.
And going back a bit in time, more employee
communications info is here.
Coverage of June's International Association
of Business Communicators Toronto 2003 Conference-- Click
here for coverage inside BAK's Report Read the wrap-up story.
|
 |
Suzanne Kilgore
Classical singer -
For biographical and performance information
about Suzanne Kilgore, please click
here. |
BAK's C.V., bio.
, resume
is here
Photo Portrait Packages here |
|
Coming to Toronto?
Tourist
info is here.
|
PUBLIC
RELATIONS AND CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS
NEWS
& COMMENT
There's a Tip-A-Day for a week
that professional
communicators can adopt, and offer to others within their organizations over in my Advice and
Features section here that you
might find useful
New on
Tuesday, January 13, 2004
I've got a soft spot for good small PR agencies,
and a BAK's Report reader heads up one of the best.
I got a note for my readers from John Devaney in New Orleans today.
Here's what he said:
I am thrilled to share some exciting news.
Our industry's leading publication, PRWeek (www.prweek.com),
has
named Deveney Communication as one of the top five Boutique PR
Firms in the country.
And, they recognized our own Nick Shapiro as one of
the top five Young
PR Professionals of the Year.
We are overwhelmed with this recognition. Nick and our entire team will
be honored for both distinctions at the 2004 PRWeek Awards program in
New York in March-where PRWeek will also name the top finalist for both
awards.
The five agencies that made the PR Week boutique list are:
Airfoil Public Relations
Deveney Communication
Keating & Co.
Kirvin Doak Communications
Travers Collins & Co.
And who, you ask, is on the young professionals list with Nick?
Here's the five:
Ken Birge Weber Shandwick
Natalia Flores Burson-Marsteller
Nicholas Shapiro Deveney Communication
Melissa Smolensky Porter Novelli
Shauna Wreschner Ruder Finn
I like some lists, and I offer congratulations to these folks. A million
years ago I made it onto one of these lists myself;, as one of the five
most respected PR people in Canada. I was pleased, of course, to make the
list, but more pleased when I saw the company I was keeping, including
Ruth Hammond and John Francis and Luc Beauregard.
New on
Monday, January 12, 2004
|
I had to photograph myself
last week |

This is BAK |
I've written a feature column for O'Dwyer's PR
Daily, to be published, I believe, later this week, and O'Dwyer's
needed a photograph. So I did it myself.
PR LESSON? This is the kind
of casual business photograph that I believe should be in the
media relations section of most business web sites, easily
accessible by business editors looking for a shot ti illustrate a
story in which your company is mentioned.
My face naturally falls into a fairly non-happy expression, so
I needed to get myself smiling for the shot. My trick? I told
myself a story about a boy named Chief and a dog named Ben. (Chief''s
my younger son and Ben is my best friend who is not a human.) |
| I
continue to promote the National Film Board animation workshops,
for free. (my promotion, not the workshops |
Allan, above left, is a newcomer to the workshops, and that's his
great Frankenstein creation in the close-up photo. Jonathon is one
of the NFB staff that make the workshops a lot of fun, and very
educational, for the kids.
At left is my boy and his mom. Parents are allowed to
help the kids with their creations, but this boy is the executive
producer and creative director, and the mom is his production
sculptor. |
The National Film Board Toronto
office, a block from my office, holds animation workshops for
children on Saturdays and Sundays. they run from 1 - 3, and cost
$5 per child. Bring a VHS tape and you'll be able to take home a
copy of your little animated film. |
|
Re-Imagine! is a great
book for PR People -- it will encourage you,
if it doesn't depress you that so much, so good, gets not done |
Re-Imagine!
Tom Peters
Dorling Kindersley Limited |
I'm reading Re-Imagine!, by
Tom Peters, and by the fifth page I'm thinking that his book
certainly aligns to a lot of my "Tough 2004 issues"
story just below. I'm not a big reader of business books, but I
wholeheartedly recommend this book.
But a caution -- there's a little piece about his tombstone,
and it reflects one of my First
Principles, which are listed here. That principle is "We
are only as good as our employer allows us to be." And the
tombstone Tom does not want"
Thomas H. Peters
1942 - 2003
He would have done some really cool stuff
but his boss wouldn't let him
And the tombstone Tom would like?
Thomas H. Peters
1942 - Whenever
He Was A Player |
New on
Monday, December 29, 2003
It's going
to be a tough 2004 for us and our profession
| Twelve of the
biggest business and social issues that will require the best
skills of North American PR people -- what we'll have to help our
clients deal with |
Twelve
of the biggest PR professional issues and attitudes that will
affect North American PR people in 2004 -- what will help or
hinder how we will operate |
* The overall credibility of
business
* The interest (or lack thereof) people around the world have in
dealing with America and Americans
* Disconnects, including the differences between reality and
perceptions, and between professed beliefs and values and actions
and performance
* The lack of worldliness of our clients
* Demographics, population pyramids and saturations of various
kinds
* Too much information
* Shareholder value vs. Corporate Social Responsibility
* The politification of US society and potential politification of
Canadian society
* Christian bigotry vs. fundamental personal freedoms
* A growing lack of intuition and the simple ability to listen,
hear, see and read, honestly -- deaf and blind, but not dumb
* One I haven't thought of yet
* Another I haven't thought of yet |
* No advocacy on our
behalf by our associations and so-called leaders
* Bad surveys, crappy research, causing false enemies
* Lazy, pack-driven, habit-driven, journalism
* The lack of understanding of and about PR; lack of credibility
in our profession
* The nonsense of the concept of "The Americas"
* Lack of worldliness -- especially our clients; especially at US
head offices of multi-national organizations
* Adapting technology
* Getting approvals from know-it-all clients
* The lack of client courage; pulling our own punches through
self-censorship
* Synchronizing with advertising, investor relations, human
resources and other client departments/activities
* The shrinking local news and business news news holes
* Human Resources departments |
New on
Wednesday, December 24, 2003
Merry
Christmas
New on
Saturday, December 13, 2003
UPDATE: There's a
wonderful portfolio of his work in the year-end Person of the Year issue
of Time Magazine.
James Nachtwey, one of
the greatest war photographers of all time, and Michael Weisskopf, a
reporter, both working for Time magazine, were injured in Baghdad
Wednesday night
According to a New York Times story, Mr Weisskopf grabbed a grenade that
had been thrown into their vehicle and was throwing it back out when it
exploded, losing his right hand but limiting injury to others. Two
soldiers riding in the same Humvee were also injured.
Sometimes we forget that journalists put themselves in the acute danger
in order to bring back stories about war.
Mr. Nachtwey has been featured in a wonderful TV documentary about how
he works. War photographers are a different breed -- Salvador, In the
Line of Fire, a Year of Living Dangerously, and a more recent movie set
in Yugoslavia (the plot was a photographer was missing, his wife went
looking for him...) are all too accurate, I believe, based on
conversations I've had with war photographers.
The same story said that at least 16 journalists have been killed in
Iraq this year.
I never was a war photographer -- I left daily newspaper work after a
couple of riots and picket line battles, but was never shot at and no
one ever threw a grenade at me.
And my only serious death threat came after I was in the PR business for
many years, and nothing came of that.
New on
Thursday, December 11, 2003
Free media
monitoring for charities -- but only if you meet the criteria
A BAK's Report reader sent me the info on
this; neigther of uys knows much about the organization, but you can
follow the link at the bottom of my extract from the news release. And
good luck...
New PR
Grants Available for Non-Profit Organizations Applications Now Being
Accepted; Awards To Be Made This Month
Stratford, CT. Public
relations grants to not-for-profit organizations are now being made
available in a new grant program announced by CyberAlert, Inc. (www.cyberalert.com),
an online media monitoring company. At least five grants will be
awarded, consisting of one full year of free press clipping service
ranging in value from $2,400 to $4,800.
Simple and secure grant
application forms are available online at https://secure.cyberalert.com/grants.html.
All not-for-profit,
educational and charitable organizations in the United States and
Canada are eligible for the grants. CyberAlert is accepting grant
applications now and will announce the grant recipients at the end of
the year. The free year of service will extend from January to
December 2004.
"To our knowledge, this
is the first time a media monitoring service has offered no-cost
service grants to not-for-profit organizations," said William J.
Comcowich, president and CEO of CyberAlert. "In this time of
tight budgets for not-for-profit organizations, the new grant program
is one way for us to give back to the public relations profession that
has helped our business grow and expand over the past five
years."
You can go to the Cyberalert site to read the
rest of the news release, and learn more about the company.
New on
Wednesday, December 10, 2003
More news about
how the unthinking stupidity and greed
of Wall Street and The City have harmed our profession.
Jack O'Dwyer's PR Daily
is running a large feature today on the economic and social
impact, almost all bad news, of the takeovers and consolidations in the
business over the past few years. Here's how the O'Dwyer's PR Daily
story starts, and you almost certainly know people affected.
The announcement yesterday that Interpublic is selling $650 million
in stock to pay down debt and for other purposes puts the spotlight on
the staggering debt of the five big ad/PR conglomerates. It's $13.29
billion.
Their free-spending ways, criticized by the credit rating services,
have caused a world of hurt in the PR counseling field, where they
have behaved like the proverbial bull in the china shop.
You can get to the site and
read the whole story, courtesy of O'Dwyer's Christmas time free
look-see. Just use freepass as the user name and xmas as the password,
at http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/1210comm_conglomsd.htm
Whether the takeovers came
from New York's financial community or from London's City financial
district, even the men and women selling out their businesses have seen
their dreams shattered. After decades of building strong, vibrant firms,
and thinking they could cash in and get rich, (and in many cases,
generously share some of the wealth among their employees) many sold out
for stock that's today worth about the same as wallpaper. But the
merchant bankers and their stockbrokers all made out like bandits, as
the expression goes. Or maybe that's not just an expression.
New on
Friday, December 5, 2003
The
rules for quoting from BAK's Report -- If
any journalists, or others writing a report or participating in a
discussion, want to quote from BAK's Report, please make sure you get
the context right. I can imagine jerks making selective quotations that
will distort what I write, on purpose, and I can imagine stupid people
doing this distorting by accident.
But for smart and/or
honest and honorable people, feel free to quote and comment, lift
paragraphs (or two or three of them) or put in a link back to here. And
if you want, send your commentary back to me and I may alter my stories
to reflect your comments. email to BrianKilgore@BrianKilgore.com
CANADA IS A SEPARATE
COUNTRY. So is Australia, and France, even with the European Union
Further to the Edelman / PRSA / "is America loved" --
"shocked" story below. Today I was looking at the web
site of a US-based multi-national, and I could not for the life of me
find a link to any kind of web site for its Canadian operations. And
when I went to the media center part of the site, I got one name as the
media contact for all of North America, one for all of Europe and one
for all of Asia.
I just sat here shaking my
head. Do not the Yanks who run PR departments of American-based international
companies know enough about the world to realize that that French
journalists looking for stories don't want to go to London for info;
Australian's don't want to go to Hong Kong, and Canadians don't want to
go to Washington?
New on
Friday, December 5, 2003
|
Daniel J. Edelman, founder and chairman of Edelman PR Worldwide,
addressed a public affairs symposium of the International Section of PR
Society of America held at the U.N. yesterday and today.
As I read it, I started shaking my head, wondering if this package of
meat was past its 'best before" date. But Edelman has made such a
contribution to our profession, I thought the story was worth repeating.
On Friday, David Finn (Ruder and Finn) spoke, too.
|
To read the
speech, go to www.odwyerpr.com
and use freepass for the user name and xmas for the password.
All in lower case. At the bottom of the PRSA conference news
story (about David Finn and about Daniel Edelman) there's a
link to the speech itself. |
Jack O'Dwyer's PR Daily web site broke the Edelman story, as far as I
know, and Jack has told me that BAK's Report readers are welcome to
visit his site, and provided codes to get past the registration.
He wrote to me, "This is an important speech and an important
seminar. You could give all your readers a temporary link to our website
if you wish. It's freepass for the user name and xmas for the
password (all lowercase)."
The website is www.odwyerpr.com.
You'll see Jack's story about the speech, and at the bottom of the story
is a link to the speech itself. My quotation-marked words
"educational" and "intriguing" are based on my
reading of the actual speech, which I think contains some interesting
lessons for PR people. As you read the speech, you might think of these
lessons.
Edelman leads his speech with some history, saying, "When I
came back to Columbia College for my senior year in September, 1939, I
was overwhelmed by the surge of political support for the Presidency by
a group of students from the South. They carried the message of a
businessman named Wendell Wilkie. He didn't succeed in a presidential
race against Franklin Roosevelt. But he brought to public view his
concept of 'One World.' " PR LESSON #2:
Starting a speech with history is a good way to get the audience to
sleep.
A paragraph or so later, Edelman gets to a rehash of the
history of the UN --"we can consider the record of the United
Nations over the past half century" -- and then another rehash of
more modern history, from 9-11 to the invasion of Iraq. Again,
everything the audience already knows.
1039 words into the speech, he finally says something we
either care about (we did not care about 1939) or had not read in the
paper this week already. In fact, it's pretty boring well past the
1039-word mark for a few more paragraphs, until finally he gets to
"Switching gears now to globalization of PR, Id like to state that
it has proved extremely important to our firm to be in business in the
major markets of the world. We have more than 20 multi-national clients
today which we're representing in two, three or even ten or a dozen
different markets around the globe. Our greatest volume comes from these
multi-national clients. As everyone in this room knows, they don't
automatically hand you their international business. They consult with
their indigenous managers. In some places there may have been a domestic
firm that had been doing the work for some years. They usually retain
that company even as we launch an international program."
I put the words in boldface, but don't know if he raised
his voice making the point. But at least we're past international
history and talking about PR.
And finally we get to what I think is the second most
important paragraph, educational and intriguing, of the speech.
"As I'm sure all the agency people here have
experienced, it's really a one-way street, taking U.S. multi-nationals
to other parts of the world. Very little of it flows in a U.S.
direction from Europe or Asia. Clearly, this has to be corrected in
the years ahead. It's been our experience that in most instances we
have to sell the company's U.S. president rather than executives at
the headquarters in Europe or Asia. That's particularly the case with
Asian companies."
What I love here is the imperialism inferred. When an
American company expands overseas, the US bosses impose US pr companies
on the branches. But when a non-American company expands in the USA, the
"foreign" owner trusts his US president to hire a PR firm in
the USA. Chrysler in Michingan doesn't get a German PR firm imposed upon
it. Nissan does not get a Japanese firm forced on it. Or, as reported in
various papers today (and in O'Dwyer) Hollinger Inc. in the USA does not
get a Canadian or British PR firm imposed upon it, but hires Keksk &
Co. in NY, for the USA, and a British firm to handle British
issues.
He writes about American giants taking over local PR
agencies -- PR LESSON #2. If you get
this kind of offer, ask for cash, take the money, and run. Canada is
full of American-owned (some go back from the USA to England if you
follow the ownership chain) pr agencies still locally
"managed" by the former owners, tied to the firm by stock
deals, with their stock prices in the toilet, facing nutsy demands for
money to be sent to NY and London. The former owners have given up
control, got low-priced stock, have bosses demanding ever-increasing
fees, and pissed-off clients
And here, tied to PR LESSON #3,
is the most important, educational and intriguing,
paragraph for my readers, from his speech.
"The United States is currently facing an
unprecedented wave of hostility from foreign countries. My son
Richard, our company President and CEO, and Pam Talbot, U.S.
President, were shocked by attitudes of our staff and people
generally toward the U.S. when they participated in a meeting of our
European managers in Amsterdam recently. The Europeans feel now it's
not the "Ugly America" but an "America Gone
Wrong." That's basically Iraq. But another key factor is the
paradox that we support free trade but we put tariffs on steel and
textiles."
For months BAK's Report has been urging (it's PR lesson
#3 here) PR managers in international organizations to pay special
attention to how various companies view the USA, especially when
American PR managers are forcing US-created programs on the branches
around the world. Edelman and Edelman, a smart old man with a smart son,
were both so slow of brain that, he said at the United Nations, they
were "shocked." No surprise to me, or to BAK's Report
readers who have been paying attention.
New on
Thursday, December 4, 2003
 |
Billy Ray Cyrus is in Toronto, filming a
television program called "Doc."
One of the best two-way community relations and external
promotion programs is behind the filming of this and other TV
shows and movies.. From the Toronto side, there's strong and
effective efforts from the municipal, provincial and federal
governments, to convince film makers based in the USA and other
countries that they should come to Toronto to shoot.
And at the same time, the film makers work hard to get the city
to make extra special efforts to accommodate their special needs.
Below we see a genuine Toronto police officer directing traffic
during rush hour, as Billy Ray "drives" his pickup past
a faked New York advertising pillar, followed by a fake New York
taxi-cab. |
 |
New on
Wednesday, December 3, 2003
|
David Miller is Toronto's
new mayor, with a PR lesson or two for us |
 |
Yesterday was the most
important day in this man's life, I would think. He's David
Miller, and was sworn in as mayor of Toronto, Canada's largest
city, and then he hosted a skating party in Nathan Philips
Square, in front of City Hall. And it must have been a really
long day, because here he is yawning for my camera, getting
ready to be interviewed on the Toronto One television station.
Click on the photo to see a bigger yawn. |
| PR LESSON 1 Tell your
clients that whenever they are in front of a camera, TV or
still, or near a microphone, anticipate that everything you do
will be recorded for posterity. I'm sure this yawn is in the TV
station archives now, recorded while waiting to go to air. And, PR
LESSON 2, assume that the least flattering
photograph, not the most flattering, will be the one that gets
published, like I did here. I think Mr. Miller may be a good
mayor -- I believe our last one was nuts, partly because he
was very sick -- so Mr. Miller can't help but be an improvement.
So I'm a touch embarrassed at running the worst of the photos I
took. But they make the point, and are more interesting than
the bland ones, aren't they? |
New on
Tuesday, December 2, 2003
BAK's
Courses and Coaching
In response to several questions over the past few days, I'm
formalizing my offerings of training courses. There will be more
information shortly, and you'll be able to learn more by clicking on the
little green ads up above. Information is already there on courses
relating to employee surveys.
I
have a multi-module course on interpersonal business communications, designed
to help managers communicate among themselves on business topics. It
takes several hours, once a week, for several months, and worked well
for the management team at a Canadian electronics manufacturing plant,
and for field managers across a province for a public service
organization.
I
have a course on understanding media relations, which has proven
useful to the management team at several companies, trying to get their
collective heads around how the media works, how to deal with reporters,
how to understand the agendas of reporters and editors, and so on.
There's a course on Employee Communications that radically challenges
the accepted conventional wisdom. And I'm developing What PR Pros
Need To Know About Digital Photography.
COACHING
offerings are aimed at recently promoted public relations executives
who know they can benefit from my thirty years experience; at non-PR
executives to whom PR departments report; and at lower-level public
relations people who have taken on new responsibilities in fields in
which they lack experience.
New on Monday, December 1, 2003
|
A bit of an essay on
The Relationship between Journalism and Public
Relations
This is simply a reprint of a quick
and dirty response to a message in The Fleet Street Forum, a
discussion group of primarily United Kingdom journalists.
(I welcome any Fleet Streeters who have come to look.
And perhaps some MediaPro forum members)
You could go nuts getting philosophy, the role of
journalism in society, and
so on and so forth.
We could start with this premise. There are others, of course.
The purpose of journalism is to fill the space between the ads
with
information interesting enough that people will read the paper
and be
exposed to the ads. (we care not talking about
state-controlled journalism
paid for by license fees enforced by jail terms)
And PR people can provide quick and easy information to fill
the space.
If you look at the entertainment pages of daily newspapers,
for the most
part, they are filled with PR-supplied information, perhaps
run through the
typewriter once, surrounded by ads for motion pictures and
live theatre and
music and dance, all selling tickets. Sports teams sell
tickets when there's
coverage of their sports. people vote for politicians they
have heard of.
But, people being cynics and all, and not wanting to get
suckered, the
readers demand that the information not be purely
self-serving.
So now the journalists are required to make sure it is
accurate, and editors
are required to make two judgments; First of all, is it
accurate and
interesting, and second of all, is it more interesting than
something else
that could fill the space.
That adds to the challenge facing journalist and PR person
alike.
Smart journalists have caught on that confrontation gets
readers. So, every
time there's some sort of positive story, journalists go out
to get a quote
from someone opposed. They may try to convince themselves this
is balance.
maybe, or maybe it's just stirring up trouble. "So, Mr.
Axman, what is the
position of the United Pedophiles Association on this
matter/" Is the world
better served by his quote? And what does it matter if his
association is
only 1/10 of 1/10 of 1 percent? Mr. Axman is on the other
side, and will say
something that might get one reporter's story into the paper
rather than
left in the wastebasket, with the space filled by a rival
journalist.
Or, reporters spice up their stories, which would have made
the paper
regardless of spiciness, because the added spice moves the
story closer to
the front page, or higher on the page.
Now, over in the PR world, the smart PR folks know how the
system works, and
are ready to support or oppose whatever story is being
written. It doesn't
matter if they are on the in favour or opposed side if they
get their name
in the paper, in a story that reflects their view.
In the UK, every time Blair says something, every paper looks
for an
opposition politician to quote, just for the sake of... well,
for the sake
of what?
Tony will wish everyone a Merry Christmas, and reporters will
seek out some
dullard who says this is a racism comments and Blair should be
strung up for
offending Jews or Muslims or just plain atheists who don't
celebrate
Christmas. And how can it be merry with our troops in Iraq?
And what about
Tiny Tim? His dad has to work.
But a smart anti-Christmas pr person will make sure reporters
have the
telephone number to call, or even have news release delivered.
PR meets the
needs of the journalist, but we might wonder how much the
needs really
matter.
There is a huge amount of mutuality of interest (assuming
mutuality is a
word). If I as a PR person can give your photographer the
opportunity to
take a great photograph of my client (imagine Richard Branson
as an example)
you as a reporter can write a business story on Branson's
latest enterprise,
but that story will not run buried in the back on the business
pages but
will move to page one, just because of the photograph I set up
for you. Your
story may even make it out of your paper and into papers
around the world.
And, at the same time, readers are happy to see the photo and
read the
story. So is anyone hurt?
PR ranges so far afield, it's hard to make judgments about
anything,
really. In Canada now, and I expect in the UK, newspapers and
magazines are
running stories with pictures of expensive things people could
buy to give
as Christmas gifts. Or perhaps more importantly, ask their
loved ones to buy
for them. When I look at the photos, they almost all reek of
"handout."
There's no sign the reporter when out to a dozen shops,
compared the Canon
300D to the Nikon D100, telephoned four real photographers and
asked
opinions, and then decided the Canon was to be included in the
story. To me,
it looks as if the editors just pick through a pile of news
releases, and
have someone write a story from these. And that someone got a
paycheque that
week, and readers got a story that, while not all that deep,
still was not
awful.
ASIDE -- The Canon 300D would have fully deserved the story,
and is a great
camera, and I recommend it. (update,
correction, and addition. The camera is the 300D in most of
the world, the Digital Rebel in North America, and the KISS in
Japan)
PR people have to understand reality, in two senses.
Journalists will try to
get "balance," and this is good and bad for the PR
person, depending on what
side of the question his or her client is on. And journalists
often but not
always need PR people. We've seen examples in this string of
messages where
PR people are gatekeepers. If a journalist wants a quote from
a particular
executive or leader, the journalist needs the PR person to
open the door, or
the journalist needs to be outside the restaurant when the big
shot leaves,
and then shout the question.
But, more often that not, the journalist could ask someone
else the
question. It does the PR person working for Mathew Barrett no
good if she
protects Barrett from your question, and so the boss of
another bank gets an
opportunity to comment on the latest change in interest rates,
and mention
his bank has a new loans program.
It really is an adversarial partnership -- sort of like a
marriage.
A couple of months ago I took the daily paper from Buffalo,
New York, a
Toronto paper, and a British paper (can't remember which, but
probably The
Times because it is the easiest to find in Toronto every day),
and went
through each, while sitting in a donut shop. (big table, no
one expels you
for staying too long, good coffee, washrooms) Story after
story after story
had the hand of PR. Academics could study this more carefully
and try to
determine the "importance" of each story. Were the
important stories more
pure? Well, president Bush and PM Chretien and PM Blair all
have PR people
overseeing whatever words they say, to varying degrees of
success, and they
are important to cause war, or refuse to go.
In the sports pages, access to many of the players comes via
the PR people.
Entertainment pages are a given. Good fires can often be
covered without PR
involvement just by following the fire trucks, but how
important are they?
Bombs, however, generally have police or military public
affairs officers
involved.
UK news photographers are more aggressive than those in NA,
and I note some
French photographers just got acquitted of supposed crimes.
Again, the PR -
journalism relationship depends on the nature of the story. As
a PR man, I'd
rather establish guidelines with photographers and them bring
them onto my
property after the industrial accident than have them invade
the hospital
and photograph the little kid of the unfortunate victim,
crying by her
daddy's bedside.
But more importantly, as a PR man, I'd have been working
inside the company
to spot potential bad news stories and get management to make
changes so
those bad situations would not turn into accidents, (or
arrests) and thus
would never cause me to be trying to get a reporter to ease
off on a story.
We will have a new Prime Minister in Canada in a couple of
weeks. His press
guy has already threatened the major nation-wide news
gathering cooperative,
Canadian Press. Bad move, because all that did was get every
paper in Canada
to write about the threat.
Nothing's easy.
And, by the way, I know many journalists think there's a
purpose over and
above filling the spaces between the ads. I'm one. www.BrianKilgore.com
takes you to my publication, web based, that is all about PR
and corporate
communication, and has no ads. It's main purpose is to
pressure / assist PR
people into getting better. I created it to stir up trouble
(among other
purposes)
I think I'll go put this message there, too.
BAK
|
New on Thursday, November 27, 2003
My readers
write, in regard
to the story below about employee communications.
Charles Pizzo, New
Orleans-based PR man, friend, former IABC world-wide chairman,
good
content, we just need you to take a design lesson :-) cp
Jana Schilder, one
of the best, most innovative, deepest-thinking internal communications
people in Canada, although now a broadly-based senior communications
pro who does much more than internal stuff. She's Senior Manager,
Firm-Wide Communications, at KPMG in Canada.
1. Readership surveys are
totally useless.
2. What organizations should be
doing are employee attitude surveys, where the effectiveness of the
publication is part of the communications mix. But
traditionally, publications (hardcopy and electronic) only account for
between 7 - 12 percent of how people get their information. The
two biggest questions about publications are: a) it is timely
and b) are the articles actionable? Do they help you do your job
better?
My response to Charles was
that I used the bright green to make the story very visible to one
particular reader who was new to BAK's Report, but that I'd fix up the
design later. What you see below is the fixed up version. Line length
has been shortened, color of the words changed, new background added,
column form established, and more. Plus Jana notes that many
readers love the words but wish I'd team up with a good designer. My
response is that I'm after readability, not beauty, and the volume of
content requires the format and the typographical tricks, like bold
face and color. That said, there's a redesign underway based on, among
other things, the fact that most monitors have higher resolution than
when BAK's Report was first designed.
New on Wednesday, November 26, 2003
| One BAK's Report
reader knows this is for her, just to help her thinking. But other readers
may find it useful, too.
|
I was nudged into
thinking about employee opinion surveys earlier today, and promised 3
thoughts would be in BAK's Report by 4 p.m. today. So here you go...
|
|
Don't ask questions
you don't want answers to
All specific numbers are suspect,
so work in broad strokes and with concepts
Understand that you want and need different information from various
groups,
levels and sub-sets of employees
Your senior people are probably your most important respondents
It is more important to understand actions than to understand wants |
|
Don't ask questions you
don't want answers to
The process of asking for opinions is a major outbound corporate /
employee communications initiative, and employees believe / want to
believe that their opinions and interests are important, and you will act
on them. If you are not prepared to act, do not raise false hopes by
asking what employees want.
True story:
We did a survey for an organization where health service professionals
had to be members in order to get their jobs. We asked lots of good
questions, and left some space for comments. Survey form after survey
form had write-ins saying the paid executive staff was arrogant,
un-helpful, and out of touch. The formal questions about the training
courses offered all had very negative responses, too. The end result was
that the association management further alienated employees by not
reporting the full survey results.
All specific numbers are
suspect, so work in broad strokes and with concepts
There's no difference that
matters between 82 and 78, or between $145,678 and $160,287, and you'll go
nuts trying to micro-manage your results if you worry about too much
detail. And cynics will try to examine each number and prove you wrong.
What matters to people managing employee expectations is knowing what it
is that most people agree on, or hardly any oppose, or, most in Montreal
are in favor of but two out of three in Vancouver oppose. And "around
$150,000" is good enough for planning purposes. (About specific
numbers being suspect. Note this is not "3 thoughts....")
True story: I was
reviewing survey questions earlier today for another organization,
written by a British company which asked respondents to look at a list
of 13 factors, and arrange them in order of importance. Impossible to
do, just as it is impossible for you to say whether one kind of pasta is
'better" than another. It all depends. Besides, in the real life
British example, maybe items 12 and 13, even if far down the list, are
still "very important." What the survey should have asked is,
"Please mark each of the 13 items as very important, somewhat
important, neutral, or doesn't matter." Then you'd have some useful
information to use in designing a program. (click
here to see the 13 points -- can you put them in order of
importance, or would you say "it depends" too.
Understand that you want
and need different information from various groups, levels and sub-sets of
employees.
What many managers, and too many
employee communications specialists, at headquarters believe is that
employees far down the organization, time zones away from headquarters,
care about broad company policies and actions. They don't. They care about
their plant, and their community, and their division, and it's only a few
of their colleagues who want, and will benefit from, the big picture. So
offer the big picture to everyone, (you don't know which of the younger
folks far away will rise to the top) but don't worry about all those who
don't care, don't read the company headquarter news. The few who do are
the few who will get promoted and take leadership roles. The people on the
plant floor usually have a narrow view. It's good enough that they want to
do quality work, cheerfully. So when you do your survey, sort out the
corporately-engaged from the locally-engaged, and measure what matters
with each group.
|
True story:
I was working with a 250-employee Canadian manufacturing sub of a
European powerhouse, and we'd arranged for all 250 employees to see a
live video feed of the world-wide chairman and CEO speaking to all the
company's hundred thousand employees. At our factory, about five people
paid attention to his speech, but most of the 250 were fascinated by a
little bit of video footage in the introduction, showing production
lines in a Thailand plant that made the same product as they did. We
taped the presentation, and played the 30 seconds of Thai footage over
and over, as our staff analyzed the operation. But no one, except the
plant general manager starting an upward career, and two mid-level
production managers who wanted to be transferred to bigger plants
someday, and my partner and I, cared about the vision and mission,
world-wide.
Your senior people are
probably your most important respondents
It's the vice-presidents and
executive vice-presidents and divisional general managers and even the
upper-managers called directors that most people think of as their bosses,
who matter most. Find out what they think. It is these executives
who need to fully understand the organization partly because they shape
it, and partly because they have to go out and face the troops, day after
day after day. Think of them as the colonels and majors and captains --
they are the men and women who lead your company into battle for market
share and profits, and they need to understand and support the
organization.
And don't forget to ask the
members of the Board of Directors -- in the era of corporate governance
spotlights, they really, truly, matter. For subsidiaries doing surveys,
what does head office in some other country think of you? For
international headquarters, what do the presidents of your subsidiary
companies think of you?
It's more important to
understand actions than to understand wants
... and the
organization's wants are more important than those of the employees.
Here are a couple of good
"for instance" questions, and you can imagine less effective
alternatives.
Q1/ How often do you tell
outsiders, whether they are friends, clients, investors or suppliers, positive information
about the company, its plans and products and services.
or..
Q2/ How often in the past
year have you changed the way you work because of something you read in
Acme Widget Infosphere.
The fact that employees may
like to read the bowling scores and updates on retirement does not mean
that these parts of a publication accomplish anything for the
organization. So instead of asking a "read most" question, ask a
"most useful to you doing your job" question.
Here's the 13
questions from the "Specific numbers" true story above.
Choice of language, i.e. jargon and cliches; choice of language tone;
consistency in message across stakeholder groups; consistency in
publishing frequency; design of publications; full color publications;
honest management; how corporate communications compares with mainstream
media; over communicating; open management; realistic stance; under
communicating; visibility -- management by walking about.
|
New on Tuesday, November 25, 2003
Nonsense from The
Toronto Star
Reader
determines if it's a public relations disaster
RANDY COHEN
EVERYDAY ETHICS
Q
I'm considering hiring a public relations representative to promote my
new business, but I worry about having him write letters for me to sign.
When I read an article or a letter, I expect the name on it to be the
author's.
The public relations rep argues that he is simply conveying my
message more effectively than I could. But wouldn't I be lying to tack
my name on his work?
Tal Ziv, Honolulu
A Context is all. When the president gives a speech, few Americans
believe he composed it. We assume that the words are those of a
speechwriter; the president is merely endorsing the policies he
articulates, and there's nothing wrong with that.
However, when someone's name appears on a novel or a magazine
article, it is fair to assume that those are his words, not just a
collection of sentiments he admires. And yet novels have been
ghostwritten, and the president has signed his name to op-ed articles
that some people find difficult to believe that he wrote (or, among the
more cynical, that he read).
In such cases, to sign your name is to claim credit for work you
didn't write — i.e. to lie. What's important is the assumption of the
reader.
If the customs of your business are such that your recipients will
take your signature to mean you wrote these letters, then that's what
you must do — write them. If they'll assume someone wrote them for
you, then no problem. Your obligation is to avoid being deceptive.
And so it's fine to employ a public relations firm to help with your
communications skills, but it's not fine to do what amounts to
plagiarizing.
Who knows where this crap
comes from, but to consider an executive agreeing to the words written by
a Pr person, created for the express purposes the signer hires the PR
person for, is plagiarism, is nonsense. Should we note that the words in
annual reports are not written by the CEO? That the quotes in news
releases started off with the CEO?
No. What matters, what is
ethical, is that the person identified agrees with the words, and
is willing to stand by them.
New on Friday, November 21, 2003
Stories have legs, and they act like
germs, and things get worse ...
A little way down the page, here,
I write about a crisis in Ontario hospitals, based on poor
sterilization of some instruments. The story grows each day,
with more and more hospitals reporting they don't sterilize properly
either, and notifying former patients that t they may be infected.
Back in June, Malcolm Gladwell spoke to the big conference of
the International Association of Business Communicators. He's
the author of The Tipping Point, a book that discusses how
"things" grow, and then boom, they reach the tipping point
and are upon us with a vengeance..
Our job as PR people is to anticipate
the excrement hitting the rotary atmospheric motion instigation
device, and be ready with shields, mops, and disinfectant. Earlier
this week I've been in several discussions about the Hollinger /
Conrad Black / unauthorized payments scandal. My belief is that this
story is going to travel far, and perhaps fairly fast. Because Black's
sort-of Canadian, (he renounced his citizenship so he could be ...)
sort of British (he's a Lord over there, not allowed by Canadian law
if he was still a Canadian citizen) plus he owns The Telegraph, and
many of Hollinger's investments, and shareholders, are in the USA,
this will be a three-legged, tri-nation story.
Now, combine Hollinger with prostate
instruments, and we come to today's PR
LESSON. You really should be a pessimist, and when you see
something out in some part of the world that could go wrong in your
organization, get ready for things to get worse. The bad news is your
non-PR colleagues will get annoyed with you for being negative, and
they won't thank you when it turns out you are right, and things to
get worse.
Here's my prediction of a few things --
broad strokes thoughts -- that could affect a large number of
the organizations for which my readers work. Are you up to speed and
ready to talk about, for attribution ...
-- Corporate governance issues. Independent
directors, and sign offs on the financials, special payments and one I
think will explode, just how much work do directors actually do for
their fees?. And related..
-- Changing definitions in financial
communications. Do you, for instance, know what
"independent" means, today?
-- Offshore operations taking jobs away
from your "native" country. Companies have a
headquarters somewhere, and only a few are thought of as not
"belonging" to some nation. So when Morgan Stanley, an
"American" company, starts killing US jobs and hiring people
in India (see the latest Fortune magazine) be prepared for internal
communications problems, and government relations problems.
-- Politics meets business -- I
hope I'm wrong, but I anticipate anti-American actions hurting
(perhaps literally) operations of American-controlled businesses
outside the USA. We've already seen how Americans are trying to punish
French organizations operating in the United States of America.
Yesterday and today's demonstrations in London are politics-based, but
I wonder when they will turn to anti-American-business. McDonald's
franchise owners in many countries already know, and have suffered,
because they are a symbol of the USA.
Managers who
screw up love to blame the messenger. That's you, so get ready
to get in trouble because you are anticipating the worst, and then get
blamed again when you are proven right.
And, to quote Stanley Bing in Fortune,
about not being believed when being pessimistic, I write, "just
remember two words. 'Arthur Andersen.'"
New on Thursday, November 20, 2003
Great story about public relations and
the media in
The Guardian, from London.
Go to
http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,1086527,00.html
and you'll see the story, written by PR woman Julia Hobsbawm
Here's the first part of the story:
Why journalism
needs PR
Members of the fourth
estate may love to hate the world of public relations but without it
they would struggle to fill their newspapers, argues Julia Hobsbawm
Monday November 17,
2003
The Guardian
Journalism loves to hate PR. It has become the norm in the media to
knock us, whether for spinning, controlling access, approving copy, or
protecting clients at the expense of the truth. Yet journalism has never
needed public relations more, and PR has never done a better job for the
media.
If you think I'm exaggerating the antipathy, here's what Bryan
Appleyard, the distinguished author and journalist, wrote in the Sunday
Times in May: "Hacks still naively pursue something they like to
call the truth. Their problem is that it no longer exists. For truth has
been destroyed by public relations executives, or 'scum' as we like to
call them."
Singling out showbusiness, celebrity and sport PR in particular,
Appleyard concluded that it has become "a virus ... infinitely more
infectious and, in the long run, more damaging than Sars" (I kid
you not).
Given that a (conservative) estimate of 75% of entertainment stories
and 50 to 80% of news and business stories emanate from public
relations, it is understandable that journalists can resent their
reliance on us.
It's worth reading the rest of the story. I've gone
through daily papers over and over, during my career, marking the stories
that clearly have the hand of pr upon them, and it is astounding how much
we in the PR profession contribute to the content of newspapers, radio
broadcasts, and television news and public affairs.
What many unobservant observers observe incorrectly is
that even the anti-pbursinss, anti-government stories that are published
are often at the instigation and with the support of PR people; it's just
that they are not PR people on the side of business or government but PR
people on the other side, whatever side that might be.
Who is Julie Hobsbawm, anyway? She's
in her late-thirties. chairwoman of Hobsbawm Media + Marketing
Communications Ltd (www.hmclondon.co.uk) in London, and, she writes to
BAK's Report, " I'm now London's first Professor of Public
Relations."
Her firm has 23 employees, and she is
the daughter, the Guardian tells us,
"of the well-known Marxist historian, Eric Hobsbawm," and then
says, "Julia has
specialised in promoting mainly leftwing and ethical clients." It
says her energy is legendary, and "She is a staunch defender of
public relations against its critics and recently attacked journalists for
"biting the hand that feeds" the media."
Good for her. I don't see the defense
coming from the associations that should be doing this.
Plus, she wrote to us, "I liked
your site very much!" although not in bold type. But she did put in
the exclamation mark.
New on Wednesday, November 19, 2003
UPDATE ON: Bad communications is a life and death
issue JUST BELOW
I've now read the sterilization instructions on
the prostrate probe that has caused vast worry to hundreds of men. The
instructions are clear; the technician at the hospital was both lazy
and badly trained, but the fault sure does not lie with the manual
writer.
New on Saturday, November 15, 2003
 |
PR LESSON:
Think about dates and get them complete and easy to understand.
Do you know what day of the week it
is, based only on the number, like 19 in this sign? No?
Do you have a better idea if you're
free on, say, next Wednesday, or free on the 19th? You don't even
know which day the 19th is, without doing math in your head, do
you?
Neither do most people, so if you
want to schedule an event and alert people in advance, put the
damn day of the month into the sign, on the invitation, into the
flyer, at the bottom of the ad.
Make dates easy, and as PR person,
it is your job to make sure everyone in your organization
communicates clearly. |
New on Thursday, November 13, 2003
PR LESSON: promote your
advertising, inside and out
When your marketing department
does an interesting advertising campaign, make sure your employees know
about it, just before it breaks, and you can often get external
publicity, if your campaign is interesting. Part of your job as PR
expert is getting good photos to give to the media, of course.
I just happened upon the chance to
take these shots:
I was not shooting for a client, but they illustrate real world meeting
fantasy, as the genuine fire truck heads out on a run, putting a pause
in the shooting of the beer commercial. In Canada, beer and hockey go
together. I shot from my office window and from the street in front of
my building.
 |
The fake action of the hockey-based TV
commercial filmed at the fire station across from my office was
interrupted as the real fire truck headed out on a genuine call.
The grey blurs in the big photo are pigeons, some of whom live
on the outside of my office air conditioner. |
New on Tuesday, September
30, 2003
Update to an earlier story
The National Film Board in Toronto has great animation classes for kids.
Here's more about them.
I wrote an earlier story here about
the animation workshops my son has been attending at the National Film
Board Mediatheque. Since then, I've visited the NFB web site and
discovered a special site for kids, at www.nfbkids.ca
with games for children. It's fun to watch how kids learn when they
get to exercise their creativity doing something they think is special.
For information about the Animation Workshop info, go to http://www.nfb.ca/mediatheque/en/fallworkshop.html
and to just learn more about the offerings of the NFB in Toronto, go to http://www.nfb.ca/mediatheque/en
New on Monday, September 29, 2003
Hacks insult flacks
We in PR continue to get insulted by journalists
Problem is, too many of us deserve it.
Richard Morochove is an accountant-turned computer
consultant who writes better than the average bean-counter, and has his
words in front of hundreds of thousands of eyes every month. Today he
writes in the Toronto Star's business section, and some other papers,
about Kodak's financial and organizational moves, and he writes about
digital photography. He's not that far off being right on the photo front,
although he leaves out some info about Kodak's leadership in professional
hardware, and he appears to not have visited the latest Kodak photo
kiosks. You can't read his column on the web, as far as I can see. It's
not on the Toronto Star web site, nor in his own.
But, inside Morochove's own web site there's a funny-if-it
were-not-so-true section aimed at the PR people who send him releases and
leads and story ideas they want him to cover. You can read the whole list
at Six
dumb PR questions you should never ask inside
www.morochove.com There's
some other very good advice in the site about how to send stories and
photos to a freelance journalist, too.
Here's one of the"six dumb" I particularly
like from his site. It rings so true, from Toronto's Richard Morochove ...
I'll
Be Coming Around the Mountain When I Comes
Q:
Will you be coming to my press conference?
A:
If I'm coming, I'll be there. If I'm not, I won't. I attend very few
press conferences, because most are a poor use of my time. Due to the
fluid nature of my work, I cannot guarantee my attendance at most
events.
Except, except...
Over in Jack O'Dwyer's PR Daily, the biggest
and best (next to BAK's Report) on-line PR publication, my friend Fraser
Seitel (never met him in person, still think he's a friend) has written
today, in a great professional development feature, these words...
Seitel
#7 Alert the media.
And speaking of the press, journalists are
notorious no-shows at special events.
They'll tell you they're coming and may, in fact,
plan on making it. But then, at the last minute, a new assignment
beckons, and you're left with a low media turnout at the function and
egg on your face with the CEO.
So journalists must be called early and often. See
if they're available for the event by notifying them early on. Check
back with them prior to the event to see if they still plan to attend.
Finally, on the morning of the event, call their offices just to make
sure.
Few things are more disconcerting - or suicidal --
for a PR professional than having no reporters show up at a press
conference.
So how do you resolve the apparent conflict between
Mr. Morochove's view, as the getter of the callers, and Mr. Seitel's
position, as the gettee of the calls?
PR LESSON?
Develop really good lists that indicate the nature and preference and
relationship with various reporters. There are some events where you are
only working with an assignment desk, and do not know the names of
individuals who might come. Other times, you have specific names of
reporters. We all know now that if we've invited Mr. Morochove, we'll
just annoy him if we call again. Seems to me that since he's an
accountant, he understands how to keep dates straight, and since he's a
computer expert, he knows how to be reminded electonically. So,
beside Morochove, on your list you mark -- call to invite; do not
remind by phone. Then the day before, send him a reminder e-mail.
Don't call and annoy him.
But for me, say, if you wanted BAK's Report to cover
an event, call me twice if you want, and send a pre-paid taxi.
Media relations is not a job for juniors. If
someone is going to call a reporter, make sure it is someone senior
enough, and knowledgeable enough, to talk intelligently with the reporter
if you should reach a human and not an answering machine. Oft-times the
reporter will write a pre-interview story, and you'll get two hits for the
price of one, but only if the call the day before is from someone willing
and able to be quoted. And the media relations person needs to know the
industry, its issues, and where your organization fits in.
BAK's Hint for best phone
reminder system? Have one of the speakers at the news
conference make the call, unless you really need to keep a lid on the
content of the event. Let the reporter pre-interview one of the
principals.
And finally -- Mr. M. is right on when he says
most press conferences are a waste of his time. Instead, don't hold
a press conference, hold some sort of industry event, aimed at clients
and prospects and educators and other prime audiences, and then invite the
reporters too. They'll still learn about your product or service, they'll
be able to interview other people, and all in all, the efforts to hold
the event will pay off much better.
I shake my head at the public relations
organizations ...
Here's the intro to a paper I'm presenting at the
management committee meeting this afternoon of one of my clients.
For more than 30 years I’ve been in the PR business, and for that
entire time, the profession has done a poor job explaining just what
public relations is, and why it matters.
The result; half the world seems to think PR is lying to the media,
and the other half thinks it means organizing parties.
Here is the world’s best definition of the craft and profession;
PUBLIC RELATIONS, as defined by BAK:
"The management function which
determines an organization's communications-related objectives,
evaluates public attitudes, identifies the policies and procedures of an
individual or organization with the public interest, and plans and
executes a program of action to earn public understanding and acceptance
and cause actions to meet the objectives."
The definition of public
relations, and a phrase by phrase breakdown of it, are
here, near the bottom of this page. It would be great if the
bosses of the organizations would go out and tell the world what it is
we do, instead of organizing more was to extract more money from their
members. But that, unfortunately, seems to be what drives them.
New on Monday, September 22, 2003
Are ethics and communications in
general
important topics in the business community, or not?
I had two interesting conversations last week. In
one, a man who supplies keynote speakers to major business conferences
in Canada and the US told me that when discussions of what speaker to
select get around to experts on either ethics or communications, the
conference organizers lose interest.
And, on the other side of the coin, (and the other
side of the ocean) in an e-mail exchange with Sandra Macleod, Chief
Executive of Echo Research in London, Paris and New York, she told me
about the ever-growing interest in ethics, and corporate social
responsibility, telling me she's launching a new study this Wednesday,
September 24, about CSR and the business community.
"Ethics will not die down that easily," she wrote. I hope to
have more about her conference here by the end of the week.
New on Thursday, September 18, 2003
PR LESSON:
Always include the day when you publish a date.
It
seems so obvious, but designers who can't think, and poor PR people, all too
often leave out useful information. Today I read this notice from the
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation: "... Hosted by Andy Barrie,
September 22, 5 - 7 p.m. ..." which forced me to go to a calendar and
look up the 22nd, to determine what day of the week it is. Why not just put
"Monday" in the notice, making it easier for everyone? Are people
brain-dead?
Kids learn animation at
National Film Board:
The Toronto office of The National Film Board of
Canada has a wonderful Saturday and Sunday program teaching animation to
children. It's from 1 - 3 both days, costs $5 per session, parents are
welcome to watch for free or participate for their own five bucks. The kids
learn about scripts, make their own props, think about the actions, learn to
plan and implement, and all in all, have fun while learning a lot. If you
bring your own blank videotape, you can take away a copy of your work.
The NFB office is in the Toronto entertainment district, at the corner of John
Street and Richmond Street. The instructors are recent graduates of one of
the best animation courses in the world, and they really know how to work
with kids.
I'm planning on telling a newspaper education
reporter about this course. It really educates kids, and it is fun. If
you arrive early, you get to watch movies for free. I recommend Wrabbit, a
cartoon, if the kids are seven or older. Parents will enjoy it, too. Info
about the workshops is at at http://www.nfb.ca/mediatheque/en/fallworkshop.html
New on Sunday, August 17, 2003
|
LISA HOMER
The new president of the Canadian
Public Relations Society speaks to BAK's Report readers.
I
asked Lisa Homer, a Calgary PR-woman and the newest president of
CPRS, what her plans were for the advocacy part of her role
leading the organization. Here, below, is what she wrote.
What do you think? Is there an action program
here? I don't see any sign of the one person who could make a
difference, the actual President, out making our profession important.
No, there's some speakers bureau, and you've never seen one of these
that was any good, have you?
I can remember back, many years ago to another
Calgary president. John Francis, from Francis Williams and Johnson,
made a coast to coast speaking tour. And Jean Valin made some good
efforts a few years ago. But those are the last times I remember any
president actually out talking about the association he or she was
supposed to lead. I've spent time in the CPRS web site tonight trying
to find indications of external efforts. Not much there. But her
article talks about the presidential tour. I need to find out more.
UPDATE: With an hour of putting up this story, I
got more info from Lisa Homer. Some of the examples in her piece
stretch back over the years, apparently. (Accreditation ads, for
instance) There's no plan, yet, for her to make a major
effort to speak to senior business execs, but it's a topic to be
discussed several months from now at a board meeting.
I don't think she understands she's the most
important public relations practitioner in Canada, the elected head of
an organization desperately in need of leadership. But, on the other
hand, who else is there willing to fight for the reputation of our
profession?
|
By Lisa Homer, President, Canadian
Public Relations Society
The public relations profession could use a little "p.r."
As public relations professionals, we all know this, but it’s
a little like the shoemaker’s children.
The Canadian Public Relations Society has a role in
promoting our profession and advocating for our place with
the key decision-makers in an organization. We have been
doing this in one way or another for several years through
accreditation promotion, the presidential tour, recent
articles in some key publications, national conferences,
media relations, the awards program, and professional
development initiatives at the local level.
At the national level, we will continue promoting our
profession by going outside of our membership doors and
inside other organizations. One of the ways to accomplish
this is by creating a speakers’ bureau. We hope to have
some of our long-standing, experienced members take
advantage of speaking opportunities with various
organizations outside of our profession like APEGGA, the
Human Resources Association, the various accounting
membership associations and so forth. Speaking opportunities
will provide us with a venue to talk with those with whom we
closely work to promote our value. I believe two of our
greatest skills are the ability to look at the big picture
and the ability to synthesize information for all audiences,
no matter how complex or sensitive that information may be.
But the promotion of our profession does not come from
the national or local association alone. Each and every day,
we demonstrate our knowledge, skills and experience as
individual public relations professionals. To truly
demonstrate our abilities to those outside our profession,
we must commit to lifelong learning, to adhering to our code
of professional standards, and to continuing to build our
base of accredited members.
|
New on Tuesday, August 12, 2003
BAK's Report and I are mentioned in a Ragan
publication
Charles Pizzo, one of the top speakers at the IABC conference in
Toronto this June, a past chair of IABC, and a New Orleans-based PR
man, has written about on-line journalism in PR Intelligence,
a Ragan publication. It's a good article, even without his mention of
BAK's Report.
Here's what he wrote about us.
We’re deep in uncharted territory. Online writer Brian Kilgore (Blogger?
He says “no!,” preferring journalist) has confounded observers
with views about the various global communication associations. He’s
a critic and a champion both, and he really doesn’t care what you
think. He calls ’em as he sees ’em, a sort of journalistic gunslinger—to
borrow a phrase penned by Kathleen Parker (a syndicated writer who
composed an insightful piece about the blogger phenomenon).
Should the subjects of Brian’s blog—he finds that term
insulting—treat him as a journalist? Or, as an individual who
reports in a Web log, BAK’s Report?
PR Intelligence is a registration-only (but free) publication
that is well-worth reading. Just go to www.ragan.com/pri
And work your way thought the (easy) registration process, and you
can read not only this story, but others about crisis communications,
the real estate business, and more.
Elaborating on Charles' quote about me, yes, I am a
journalist when I'm writing this, but a journalist from the
"columnist" side of the ledger, with opinion. I work hard at
the facts, making sure I get them right, but willing to comment on
them, too. And since Google can find content within BAK's Report, and
since journalists use Google to do research, PR people should think of
BAK's Report the same way they think of the New York Times, sort of. A
lot less circulatio |